What anyone actually paid
This page tells you the honest answer to the most valuable question about Dholera land, which is what real buyers really paid. It matters because the answer is that no official document in this set says, and every figure being circulated as an answer is something else.
No paid placement · No developer money · Nothing for sale
In plain words
Nobody knows, and no document here says. Of the twelve parcels in this register, not one carries a stated consideration for the land. Two figures get mistaken for prices. The rate card is a published asking rate, which is what the authority asks rather than what anyone paid. The Re. 1 per square metre lease rent in the accounts is a nominal annual rent that sits on top of an upfront premium nobody has published. Neither is evidence of a transaction.
- Parcels with a stated price
- 0 of 12No document in this source set states what any named allottee paid. Status UNKNOWN.
- The rate card
- An asking rateRs 400 to Rs 8,000 per square metre, published by DICDL. Status OFFICIAL as a published rate, not as a price paid.
- The Re. 1 figure
- Nominal annual rentCharged over and above the upfront lease premium. Status OFFICIAL. Source: DICDL Annual Report 2024-25, for the year ended 31 March 2025, PDF page 109.
- The one stated Rs 1 consideration
- Road land, not a saleA 99 year lease back of road land from the authority to DICDL at a consideration of Rs 1. Status OFFICIAL. Source: DICDL Annual Report 2024-25, for the year ended 31 March 2025, PDF page 111.
Three numbers that look like prices and are not
The first is the rate card. A published rate is the price on the shelf. It tells you what the authority asks and it excludes GST, registration fees and stamp duty by its own note. It is not a receipt.
The second is the Re. 1 per square metre annual rent. It is nominal by design and the audited accounts state it is charged over and above the upfront premium. Quoting it as the cost of Dholera land is simply wrong.
The third is the Rs 1 consideration on the road land lease back. That is a transfer of road land between two public bodies for a token sum, not a market transaction, and it covers land appropriated for roads rather than a plot anybody could buy.
The project investment figures are a fourth trap
Two allottees in this register have large rupee figures attached to them, approximately Rs 2,000 crore and approximately Rs 35 crore. Both are stated total project investment, meaning what the company says it will spend building the project. Neither is the price of the land, and the source says so in the same sentence. That is set out on the project investment page.
Where a real price would come from
Not from any of these documents. A transaction price for a specific parcel would sit in a registered lease deed or in the registration department's index-2 entry for that deed, which is the public register of registered documents. Neither is in this source set.
So this register prints UNKNOWN in the consideration column and keeps it there. When a registered deed appears for any parcel here, that will be an edition change, and it will be logged on the changes page.
The declared gap, word for word
NO CONSIDERATION PER PARCEL. No document states what any named allottee actually paid. The rate card gives the published asking rate; the audited accounts give the Re. 1/sq.m nominal annual rent. Neither is evidence of a specific transaction price.
Declared gap 3 of 13 in the allotments-parcels dataset, edition 2026-Q3, extracted 4 August 2026. Gaps are published, never quietly filled
Status: OFFICIAL. Source: the allotments-parcels dataset, declared gaps. Last verified 4 August 2026. This record is published in full, with its own source quote, in the downloadable dataset.